Toshiba TR200 SSD Review: Affordable SATA Solid State Storage

Our Test Methodologies: Under each test condition, the SSDs tested here were installed as secondary volumes in our testbed, with a separate drive used for the OS and benchmark installations. Out testbed's motherboard was updated with the latest BIOS available at the time of publication and AHCI mode was enabled.

The SSDs were secure erased prior to testing, and left blank without partitions for some tests, while others required them to be partitioned and formatted, as is the case with our ATTO, PCMark, SANDRA, and CrystalDiskMark benchmark tests. Windows firewall, automatic updates and screen savers were all disabled before testing and Windows 10 Quiet Hours were enabled. In all test runs, we rebooted the system, ensured all temp and prefetch data was purged, waited several minutes for drive activity to settle and for the system to reach an idle state before invoking a test.

HotHardware Test System Intel Core i7 and SSD Powered

Processor - Motherboard - Video Card - Memory - Audio - Storage -

Intel Core i7-8700K Gigabyte Z370 Ultra Gaming (Z370 Chipset, AHCI Enabled) Intel HD 630 16GB G.SKILL DDR4-2666 Integrated on board Corsair Force GT (OS Drive) Intel SSD 545s Crucial BX300 WD Blue 3D Toshiba TR200 Series

OS - Chipset Drivers - DirectX - Benchmarks -

Windows 10 Pro x64 Intel 10.1.1.44, iRST 15.8.1.1007 DirectX 12 IOMeter 1.1 HD Tune v5.70 ATTO v3.05 AS SSD CrystalDiskMark v5.2.2 x64 PCMark Storage Bench 2.0 SiSoftware SANDRA

IOMeter I/O Subsystem Measurement Tool

As we've noted in previous SSD articles, though IOMeter is a well-respected industry standard drive benchmark, we're not completely comfortable with it for testing SSDs. The fact of the matter is, though our actual results with IOMeter appear to scale properly, it is debatable whether or not certain access patterns, as they are presented to and measured on an SSD, actually provide a valid example of real-world performance for typical consumer workloads. It's a purely synthetic benchmark with a seemingly limitless configuration options and test methodologies. In other words, the access patterns we tested here may or may not reflect your particular use case. That said, we do think IOMeter is a reliable gauge for relative available bandwidth and throughput within a given storage solution. In addition there are certain higher-end workloads you can place on a drive with IOMeter, that you can't with many other storage benchmark tools available currently.

In the following graphs, we're showing two sets of access patterns; acustom Workstation pattern, with an 8K transfer size, 80% reads (20% writes) and 80% random (20% sequential) access and a 4K access pattern with a 4K transfer size, comprised of 67% reads (33% writes) and 100% random access.

The Toshiba TR200 series drives are all tightly grouped and put up similar numbers here, regardless of the access pattern or queue depth. In relation to the other drives we tested, the TR200s trailed across the board, though the deltas were more dramatic as the queue depth increased. Note, however, that the vast majority of consumer workloads reside at a very shallow queue depth of 1.

The transfer rates during the high queue depth runs mirror what we saw in terms of IOPS -- the Crucial BX300 and Intel 545s trade victories depending on the access pattern used.

AS SSD Compression Benchmark Bring Your Translator: http://bit.ly/aRx11n